Friday, February 11, 2022

"Shades of vanilla" ("Fifty Shades of Grey")/ "Cinderella meets Prince Harming" ("Fifty Shades Darker")/ Freedom Convoy

 Dec. 20, 2017 "Shades of vanilla": Today I found this movie review by Rebecca Tucker in the Edmonton Journal on Feb. 13, 2015.



Christian Grey is kind of nuts.

That was my prevailing thought during Fifty Shades of Grey, the two-hour screen adaptation of the E.L. James book that, at one point, was selling two copies a second. I haven’t read the book, so maybe there’s enormous nuance to the Grey character that Jamie Dornan does not accurately depict — if at all.


But having seen the film it’s difficult to reconcile how anyone’s fantasy would involve being stalked and harangued by a billionaire whose goal is to have you sign a sex contract.


Grey and Anastasia Steele (Dakota Johnson as the mousey English lit student) meet when she goes to interview the 27-year-old billionaire she somehow knows nothing about. 


She literally falls into his office. He stares at her. She asks him if he’s gay. He says something about “harnessing people.” She admits to being an English lit student. He declares she must like Jane Austen. She gets up to leave. He steals her paperwork. She is intimidated by him. Boom. Romance.


Before there’s even any idea of a sexual relationship, Grey declares himself “not right for her,” says he is “not yet” a serial killer, tracks her down at a bar, buys her a new computer and eventually has her sign a non- disclosure agreement about their relationship. (How is that not a red flag?)


These events unfold just about as quickly and dryly as listed here, leaving no room for character development or any idea of why this guy is so into this girl — other than that she’s easily manipulated, inexperienced and virginal (in the literal sense of the word, though this is a problem “rectified” in one of the film’s many unfortunate choices of wording).


In other words she’s a woman over whom he can exercise total control. This he hopes to do in the form of an actual contract outlining the type of sex he likes to have. This contract — not the sex itself — and its negotiation comprise 75 per cent of the film’s running time and most of our romantic leads’ conversations. 


It is the longest, unsexiest board meeting of all time.


She says she’s not interested. He nevertheless shows up unannounced at her home in the middle of the night, walks into her bedroom, ties her up and has sex with her. This is not the grand romantic gesture of a scorned lover trying to win back the lady of his desire. This is an intrusion, and a crime.


The problem isn’t that Christian likes his sex kinky. The problem is his wooing tactics. He describes himself as “not normal” and “50 shades of (messed) up” in his affinity for bondage and light BDSM. No, he’s “not normal” because he’s a coercive, boundary-less emotional manipulator.


The problem is that this is presented as some sort of darkly sexy Cinderella story, when really it’s some sort of psychological horror story that has little to do with unconventional sex.


And while the film’s focus is almost singularly the notion of sex, director Sam Taylor-Johnson goes light on actual erotica. Unless your appetite for screen depictions of human sexuality is particularly low or puritanical, it’s unlikely Fifty Shades will leave you scandalized. It’s so benign that it barely titillates.


That’s a shame, too: The cinematography is beautiful and artful in a way that would have lent itself quite well to the type of erotica many will be expecting.


And calling the characters two- dimensional gives them credit for an extra dimension: Ana is submissive. Christian is dominant. Christian and Ana’s romantic arc is so telegraphed that by the time it hits the inevitable, “I want more from you!” “You’re changing me!” argument, viewers may find themselves wishing for more contract talk.





Feb. 10, 2017 "Cinderella meets Prince Harming": Today I found this article by Tina Hassannia in the Edmonton Journal:

The follow up to Fifty Shades of Grey should really be called Fifty Shades of Vanilla. Or maybe Cinderella.

When we left our innocent protagonist, Anastasia Steele (Dakota Johnson), at the end of the first film, she had deserted her S&M-obsessed billionaire boy-toy, Christian (Jamie Dornan), for completely understandable reasons. 

Ana wasn’t enthusiastic about Christian’s particular kinks, but more than that, he was manipulative from the very first meet-cute, long before Ana signed a BDSM agreement that determined, beyond boundaries in the bedroom, rules concerning what she should eat and wear.

But Christian’s a new man in the movie adaptation of E.L. James’s Fifty Shades Darker.

Prince Charming has given up kinkiness, claiming he needs Ana back in his life more than he needs leather whips. As if by magic, Christian’s sexual predilections wilt and he seems to have no problem humouring Ana’s vanilla tendencies.

But because this is a romantic drama and the Fifty Shades’ audience expects some easily scored titillation, the sex scenes also introduce Ana to some new racy sexual activities: Ben Wa balls (small, marble-sized balls used for sexual stimulation), massage oil, ankle restraints and some tame spanking. Ooh la la! 

Not surprisingly, sex, romance and lingering shots of Dornan’s muscular body make up the bulk of the runtime in Fifty Shades Darker, leaving little time for actual plot. One date turns into another turns into Ana moving in with him and before long things are very serious.

Outside drama comes in short bursts, including a near-rape encounter, a helicopter accident and a jealous, homicidal ex. 

These plot lines sound more intense than they actually are: The film resolves each conflict within minutes and thus renders them forgettable. 

As for the topical geography of Dornan’s upper torso, you’ll memorize every mole, scar and nipple through the sheer repetition of his flesh on display.

Of course, it’s a rare film that champions the straight female gaze over the straight male gaze, and such imagery is not necessarily a bad thing — depending on your tastes and sexual orientation. 

But it’s worth asking why a movie that targets a particular subsection of the straight women demographic can’t be better made, more intelligent and offer something more than the softest of-softcore pornography.

Fifty Shades of Grey was the fastest-selling paperback of all time in the U.K., and the movie made more than $500 million in box office sales.

Given the series’ popularity, it’s worth discussing why so many people — namely straight women — flock to this particular brand of romance. It’s especially pertinent given Christian’s creepiness and his need to “own” his woman.

Before Christian even appears in Fifty Shades Darker, Ana finds out someone has bought all six portraits of her at a friend’s art show. It turns out Christian didn’t want anyone else looking at her. 

He stubbornly tells Ana she can’t take a business trip to New York with her boss and refuses to discuss it. He buys the publishing company where she works, just for the hell of it. When she rips up a cheque Christian gave her for $24,000, he breezily has one of his minions transfer the amount to Ana’s bank account. “Why do you have my bank account details?” she asks, but the answer never comes.

Instead, Christian distracts Ana with beautiful baubles and a new MacBook. The film presents viewers with yet another distorted idea of romance, selling a fantasy of a man so hunky and rich you should consider yourself lucky if he chooses to neg you. 

That’s not how healthy, consensual relationships function — with or without a BDSM kink.

Ultimately, the film’s fantastical message to romance-hungry women is that it’s OK if their ideal sugar daddy is creepy, because diamonds are forever.



My opinion: I have never seen any of these movies.  I would be open to at least watching the first movie.

My favorite Edmonton actor Eric Johnson is in the Fifty Shades Darker and Fifty Shades Freed movies.



This week's theme is about romantic books and movies in honor of Valentine's Day:


"On the same page, romantically speaking"/ "Bedside reading"



"A daring endeavor" (Harlequin books)/ "A labour of love" (romance novels)




My week:


Feb. 2, 2022 "This teacher raised $100K to keep students from going hungry over winter break": Today I found this article on CBC news.  You know I like reading articles about charity and good deeds:



A North Carolina teacher has made it her mission to ensure her students get free lunches eveJermaine Porter, the interim principal of Lakewood Elementary, says the spin-off effect of Parker's fundraising has everyone coming together.

"It's an effort she does with her network of people, other principals from other schools come and help pack the groceries," he said.

It is a team effort that Parker hopes to continue during spring break and school breaks moving forward.

"There are a lot of hands and hearts and minds that are part of this. I am so grateful for all the people," she said. "The generosity just overflows."n when they're not in school. 

Since 2015, Turquoise LeJeune Parker, a teacher at Lakewood Elementary School in Durham, N.C., has taken it upon herself to help raise money to feed students whose families do not have enough food during school breaks.

In December, she raised over $100,000 US ($126,741 Cdn) and sent over 520 bags of groceries home with students from 12 schools. She's now working to repeat that feat before spring break next month. 

"I'm a very optimistic person," she told As It Happens host Carol Off.  "I would not be surprised if we reach more children than we did in the fall."

While she says she's happy about the community coming together to help kids in need, Parker says the underbelly of this story — hunger — is heartbreaking.

"We're not talking about a brand new phone," she said. "We're not talking about a brand new pair of shoes. We're talking about food, a basic thing."

Started with a student confession

It all started in 2015 when Parker says a family confided to her they did not have enough food to last the winter holiday break.

Parker and her husband began to realize that other families were also probably in need. She says the majority of her students rely on the free or low-cost lunches that the school provides every day.

So she decided to take matters into her own hands, and the annual fundraising for food campaign began. 

"I think I sent a text message to everybody in my phone and asked them if they could donate anything to make sure that I could send a bag of groceries to almost every family in my class," she said. "And the rest is history."

Jermaine Porter, the interim principal of Lakewood Elementary, says the spin-off effect of Parker's fundraising has everyone coming together.

"It's an effort she does with her network of people, other principals from other schools come and help pack the groceries," he said.

It is a team effort that Parker hopes to continue during spring break and school breaks moving forward.

"There are a lot of hands and hearts and minds that are part of this. I am so grateful for all the people," she said. "The generosity just overflows."



Feb. 5, 2022 Freedom Convoy:

Leo opinion: This was the poll last week:

Do you support the Freedom Convoy?

No: 60%
Yes: 25%
Undecided/ I don't know: 15%

I read an article and I voted "undecided."


Feb. 1, 2022 "The story behind this photo of downtown residents blocking a truck's path": Today I found this article by Priscilla Ki Sun Hwang on CBC news:

That's what a few Ottawa residents communicated in their body language seen in a photo circulating online — a snapshot that captures the tension between Ottawans living in the downtown core and a cross-country convoy of visitors who have occupied city streets and Parliament Hill since Friday.

The image shows a large dump truck just metres away from two residents standing in the middle of a narrow Cooper Street in the city's Centretown neighbourhood — and both sides appear to be at a standstill.

"I decided to get out in the streets in front of a big truck … because I felt powerless. By that point it was three days of non-stop honking, yelling," Marika Morris, one of the residents in the photo, told CBC News on Tuesday.

"We can't think, we can't work, we can't study."

Tuesday marks the fifth day downtown Ottawa residents have had to endure blaring honks and the smell of diesel fuel, stemming from an occupation of trucks and thousands of protesters that came to Ottawa in what began as opposition to mandatory vaccination for cross-border truckers — and has since evolved to include a range of opposition to COVID-19 public health measures.

"The only way to communicate with them was to stand in the middle of the road and make a thumbs down sign every time they honked," said Morris.

"That was the only way to communicate that we don't want them to terrorize us and we don't want them to occupy our streets."

Worried for neighbours

Morris said she typically sees people walking dogs all hours of the day — but the street has been barren for days. She knows of at least one child who's afraid to step outside, and says the vehicles are preventing some elderly residents from getting their prescription medications or grocery deliveries. 

Morris said she was "choking on the way to the pharmacy" on vehicle exhaust fumes as they idled nearby. Lebeau, who has difficulty breathing, said she had to rely on her puffer more in the past few days. 

The story behind this photo of downtown residents blocking a truck's path | CBC News


Feb. 4, 2022 "'Slap in the face of every health worker’: Canadians, top doctors respond to convoy protest threats, suggestion to avoid scrubs in streets": Today I found this article by Elisabetta Bianchini on Yahoo news:

Dr. Theresa Tam, Canada’s chief public health officer, stressed that we need to be "grateful" for healthcare workers, after hospital employees in Toronto were advised to not to wear anything to identify them has health workers this weekend, due to a possible "freedom convoy" protest.

"We need to really be grateful and appreciate our health workers and our public health workers because they’ve been working day and night for over two years to try and keep all of us safe, and it’s unacceptable, any kind of hate, any kind of violence should not be tolerated," Dr. Tam said at a press conference on Friday.

"Protests are one thing and should be done peacefully and these are the very people who are trying to help, not only to protect people against COVID-19 but to support the community and all sorts of health issues. If you had an accident, if you need surgical interventions, if you need cancer treatment, so all these workers need to be able to have a safe passage to work and I think that’s critically important."

Jean-Yves Duclos, Canada's health minister, urged all healthcare workers to report any incidents of harassment, intimidation and threats to their local police force.

'Slap in the face of every health worker’: Canadians, top doctors respond to convoy protest

 threats, suggestion to avoid scrubs in streets (yahoo.com)

My opinion: There were some negative comments on Twitter.  After reading these two articles, I'm leaning to not supporting the Freedom Convoy.  You can protest, but do it respectfully.

Feb. 5, 2022 Business news sites:  Somewhere around 2021, I started reading from these business news sites:

BNN Bloomberg

CBC news

Financial Post

Some from Yahoo

Current events/ crazy news: Yahoo


Feb. 8, 2022 "Increased sex trafficking during the Super Bowl is a dangerous myth, these L.A. sex workers say": Today I found this article by Abigail Higgins on Yahoo news:

Ahead of Super Bowl LVI on Sunday, the city of Los Angeles has been taking the usual steps to prepare to host the event: painting the field at SoFi Stadium, setting up equipment for the halftime show.

As part of that effort, there have been campaigns to stop human trafficking: Last month, signs started popping up in hundreds of Los Angeles airport bathrooms; and solemn video messages from National Football League stars have been playing on loop in the terminals, warning that offenders will face prosecution.

Almost every year, a swell of media reports and law enforcement news conferences ahead of the Super Bowl sound the alarm about sex trafficking. It's been a long-held idea that major sporting events, including the Super Bowl, the World Cup and the Olympics, trigger a surge in trafficking.

But several academic studies have found no causal relationship between large sporting events and an increase in sex trafficking. (Human trafficking refers to the use of force, fraud or coercion to obtain labor or commercial sex. Reliable statistics about human trafficking are hard to find, especially when it comes to sex trafficking.)

In recent years, sex workers' rights groups have more vocally criticized the idea that there's increased sex trafficking during the Super Bowl. Although some anti-trafficking organizations have distanced themselves from the notion, as well, it persists - and continues to give law enforcement a reason to expand their budgets and make dozens of arrests, sex workers' rights groups argue. These arrests are often a crackdown on sex workers who aren't being trafficked but are trying to do their jobs, advocates say.

Increased sex trafficking during the Super Bowl is a dangerous myth, these L.A. sex workers say (yahoo.com)


Feb. 10, 2022 "Everything you need to know about claiming home office expenses on your tax return": Today I found this article by Jamie Golombek on the Financial Post:    


Millions of Canadians are gearing up for the start of the tax filing season, methodically gathering tax slips and receipts in order to begin preparing their 2021 returns, but I’m still stuck on 2020. That’s right, last week, I was formally reassessed by the Canada Revenue Agency, which rejected my claim for employment expenses incurred while working from home due to the pandemic.

You may recall that last summer I received a “review letter” from the CRA asking for more information about various items on my return, including my claim for the new digital news subscription tax credit, proof that I made a small political contribution and, most significantly, support for my employment expenses claim.

I submitted what I thought was sufficient documentation, and I was allowed my $75 digital news credit along with my political donation, but my home office expenses were denied in their entirety as I did not send them sufficient information to justify my claim.

If you worked more than 50 per cent of the time from home for a period of at least four consecutive weeks in the year due to COVID-19, you can claim $2 for each day you worked at home during that period, to a maximum of $500 in 2021 and in 2022, up from the $400 maximum in 2020.

Expenses you can claim include: utilities, home internet, rent, maintenance and minor repair costs, and office supplies such as envelopes, paper, pens and sticky notes. 

Everything you need to know about claiming home office expenses on your tax return | Financial Post


Feb. 4, 2022 "Man bought 264 lottery tickets — and they were all winners, Virginia officials say": Today I found this article by Mark Price on Yahoo news:

One very lucky guy just collected a six-figure lottery win in Virginia, after all 264 of his tickets came up winners in two separate drawings, Virginia Lottery officials say.

Yes, 264 tickets.

Jalen Taylor of Charlottesville won $132,000 when each ticket proved to be worth $500, Virginia Lottery officials said in a Feb. 3 news release.

The prize came after Taylor went big and bought two large batches of Pick 3 tickets over a two-month span. The first was 104 tickets with the numbers 960 he got for the Nov. 18 drawing, and the second was 160 tickets with the numbers 542 he purchased for the Jan. 10 drawing.

Tickets are $1 each.

Both of his 3-digit combinations were drawn, netting him $52,000 with the first batch and $80,000 with the second, officials said.

All the tickets came from grocery stores (Food Lion and Harris Teeter) and Taylor didn’t say how he decided on the numbers. (Players can pick any three-digit sequence from 000 to 999.)

“I had a feeling,” Taylor said in the release. “When you get a feeling, just play!”

Taylor said he intends to save the cash and invest.

He beat odds of 1 in 1,000 by picking the three winning numbers.

State officials didn’t give the odds of doing it twice in eight weeks.

If you or a loved one shows signs of gambling addiction, you can seek help by calling the national gambling hotline at 1-800-522-4700 or visiting the National Council on Problem Gambling website.

Man bought 264 lottery tickets — and they were all winners, Virginia officials say (yahoo.com)

My opinion: "When you get a feeling, just play!" is like listening to your intuition.  It's good to save and invest.


Feb. 7, 2022 Scanning apps: Yesterday I posted this on my Facebook page, the Edmonton Screenwriters Facebook page, Edmonton Filmmakers Group Facebook page, and the Edmonton Film Industry Facebook page, and emailed some friends:

I'm posting this here, because the news articles are about writing and filmmaking:
I want to scan all my news articles and save them onto a USB key.
Do you have a scanner that I can come over and use?
I went to the EPL once, and it took awhile to scan a few things and email it to myself or someone else.
I guess I could take a picture of every article, but it doesn't seem as efficient.
I have like a big box of news to scan.
What is the fastest and cheapest way to scan all this?

I would really appreciate it if there is one. Thank you.

My new friend Edmon posted this:

I would check Staples or a local copy shop, and see if they have an automatic sheet-fed scanner...that way you can just feed a stack of your articles into the scanner--and the scanner will scan every article and compile it into a PDF file that can then be saved to your USB stick.

Edmonton Film Industry Facebook page: A stranger posted this:




My opinion: I think I'll use Adobe Scan.

My way is: I find a physical article I like

1. I go on the internet and type the title and writer in Google.
2. I then copy and paste the article onto my email/ blog drafts.

That takes awhile though.


Adobe Scan: I downloaded this onto my tablet.  When I take a picture of a small article, the picture wasn't good.

I tried to log into Adobe Scan with my Facebook, and then connect with my Yahoo account.

There seems to be a technical difficulty.

This is what happens: I try to do something on my own.  If it doesn't work, I ask for help.

May you please try downloading Adobe Scan and see how that works?

This a project/ hobby of mine.  There is no rush or pressure for you to help me.  


Feb. 8, 2022: I can cut and paste the article onto 8 1/2 x 11 scrap paper and then put it in the scanner.


Why are you scanning and archiving/ digitizing your physical news articles right now?

Table Topics Daily: I was asked these questions

What is something you always wanted to do, but haven't done yet?

If you only had 5 yrs to live, what would you do?


1. I would go to Las Vegas: There is a pandemic and it's hard to get back into the country, because you have to provide a negative Covid-19 test 3 days before you are to get in.  It costs time, effort, and money to do the test.


2. I would digitize all my old physical news articles onto a USB key.  I would publish all my emails/ blog posts.  This is good information and it's mainly job articles that has helped me (and readers) learn about how to get a job, etc.


I have digitized nearly all my job articles and they're saved into my email/ blog accounts.  I  haven't published all of them yet.

"A daring endeavor" (Harlequin books)/ "A labour of love" (romance novels)

 Feb. 10, 2018 "A daring endeavor": Today I found this article by Zosia Bielski in the Globe and Mail.  It's about Harlequin books being more sexual:


Pink fluorescent tubing, the kind you might imagine buzzing in a red-light district, spells out the logo for Dare, a new line of Harlequin romance novels branded as the publisher's most sexually explicit books to date. On the covers, no beefcake Fabios or ripped bodices. Instead, toned women straddle men and push them up against brick walls, staring them straight in the eye.

The forward heroines are a new look for Harlequin, which has been peddling women's fantasies for nearly 70 years. Launching this month, Dare has been marketed as a modernization of the way Harlequin treats sex.

Female agency and pleasure are at the forefront, euphemisms have been ditched for graphic terms and rose petals and candlelight have been replaced by blow jobs in moving cars.

"With Dare, we've taken it to the sexiest place we've ever been," said Joanne Grant, editorial director of Harlequin Series.

She heard from women who wanted more direct depictions of sex, and listened: "It doesn't hurt to call it what it is."

For Harlequin, which is based in Toronto, the shift to more explicit sex is long overdue: The literary blockbuster Fifty Shades of Grey came and went half a decade ago, blasting past sales of 125 million copies in 2015. With Dare, Harlequin is following a raunchy (and highly lucrative) indie romance market.

The publisher hopes to attract new readers, younger readers and existing Harlequin fans who might want a saccharine romance on Monday and something racier by Friday.

Limited to 50,000 words and printed in digital format only in North America, the Dare e-books are quick reads women can whip through in relative privacy on their commutes. Harlequin will churn out four new titles for them every month.

Anne Marsh wrote one of the first Dare titles, Ruled, about an unlikely liaison between a children's-party planner and a biker-gang member. Marsh said the new line allowed her to deepen her characters' relationships with more intense sex scenes.

"You have really big, tough alpha guys who don't hold back in bed but who also end up having these marshmallow insides and hearts for their heroine," Marsh said from the San Francisco Bay Area, where she works as a professional technical writer by day and pumps out romance novels by night.

Since the Dare books are shorter than other Harlequin titles, the characters need to fall into bed faster. Sex acts that were once verboten are no longer off-limits. "You can have people role-playing in the bedroom," Marsh said. "You can have butt sex. You can have toys. The hero and the heroine can do what feels right for them."

Not everyone is excited about Harlequin's dirty turn. Sisters Bea and Leah Koch, who own the Ripped Bodice, a romance-only bookstore in Culver City, Calif., say Harlequin is sorely late to the game with its explicit romance line. "The independent market has been putting out these books for a long time," Bea Koch said. "The publishers are catching up and wanting to get some of that money."

The Koch sisters see another trend emerging in the romance genre: feminism. "Our customer base is interested in stories about empowered women and men who find that sexy and not threatening," Leah Koch said.

Late as Harlequin may be to modern sexual mores, the publisher appears to have gotten a whiff of feminism with Dare. Damsels in distress have been traded in for careerist heroines, "fearless women who choose to make [men] part of their lives," according to the publisher. Says Marsh, "Women don't want to read about weak women."

Lisa Childs, a retired Grand Rapids, Mich., insurance agent who has written a mind-boggling 70 Harlequin romances, sees Dare's female characters as evolved, sexually and otherwise. Childs wrote the Dare title Legal Seduction, which centres on a torrid affair at a law firm involving espionage and the protagonists shagging on every surface of a well-appointed corporate office. Heroine Bette Monroe is a "challenging" executive assistant with a "deep and husky" laugh who likes to toy with her boss.

"It's not your grandma's romance with the timid virgin," Childs said. "She's an equal partner in the sexual relationship." In other words, Bette Monroe has a lot of orgasms.


In the era of # MeToo, Dare's promise to focus on strong heroines and female desire is laudable. So it's doubly disappointing, then, that some retrograde tropes emerge on the page.

In several of Dare's inaugural titles, heroines are saddled with strikingly feminized careers. One protagonist is a matchmaker, another designs bow-festooned lingerie and another plans pink and frilly "princess parties." Hard pass.

Then there's Harlequin's female orgasm to contend with. Often, climaxes are instant, with heroines screaming in ecstasy at the slightest touch of a man, much like they do in mainstream, male-directed porn. The romance genre is fantastical, but these female writers should know better.

More problematic is that two of the initial Dare titles feature scenarios that could be read as workplace sexual harassment – a turnoff if ever there was one, but especially in the wake of # MeToo

Bette Monroe's affair with her boss starts when he gets grabby with her in his office (granted, she doesn't seem to mind). In another Dare offering, Off Limits by Clare Connelly, billionaire investor Jack Grant lolls around naked in bed in front of Gemma Picton, his in-house counsel, while she tries to read him his itinerary for the day. "In the two years since I started working for Jack I've probably seen him naked on average once per week," Picton says.

The scene sharply calls to mind the behaviour of disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein and former PBS host Charlie Rose, who are both facing accusations of workplace sexual harassment, including getting naked in front of horrified female staff.

The key difference, we are told, is that Dare heroines are very into their bosses, often initiating the sex. Harlequin's Grant has this to say about the boss-assistant relationships: "This has been a popular romance trope for many years … tapping into the 'forbidden' relationship fantasy. 

We did give careful consideration at the time of acquiring these Dare titles – long before the Weinstein story hit, due to our publishing lead-in times – as to whether the dynamic was portrayed appropriately, in a way that is empowering for the heroine."

Grant said conversations about sexual consent have been ratcheting up at Harlequin, where staff consider the issue as they review, acquire and edit manuscripts. "Our copy editors will and do flag anything that may be interpreted as a little grey on the issue of consent, for further consideration by the editor and author," Grant said.

Some evidence of these editorial discussions is sprinkled throughout the new novels. As lecherous protagonist Simon Kramer eyes Bette Monroe, his executive assistant in Legal Seduction, his inner monologue reads, "He didn't want to take advantage if she'd had too much to drink."

Marsh stresses that consent is non-negotiable in the romance genre. "These are fantasies written by women for women. We want our heroes to be 100-per-cent invested in the heroine and focused on her pleasure and what she needs. If he's ignoring a 'no,' he's not a hero at that point. He's an asshole."

There is a fine tightrope to be walked here. Harlequin doesn't want to thought-police women's fantasies, fantasies that aren't always politically correct. At the same time, it wants to give them a "safe read" in which heroines call the shots and endings are happy. "It's consenting, it's positive and the women are in control," Grant said. "It's a positive experience of sex."

Beyond consent, the editorial director allows that Harlequin should take responsibility for the intimacy it depicts because some young readers treat their romance novels as de facto sex manuals. "If you snuck your book from your mum growing up," Grant says with a laugh, "you learned about sex."

In a New York Times op-ed published last month and headlined We Need Bodice-Ripper Sex Ed, bestselling author Jennifer Weiner wrote, "[Romance novels] taught readers that sexual pleasure was something women could not just hope for but insist upon. They shaped my interactions with boys and men. They helped make me a feminist."

Marsh, who devours four romance novels a week, remembers drawing up a "wish list" when she read the books at 18. "It was a safe space to try on what I might find appealing and what I might not."

Even as literary critics dismiss the romance genre, these books can serve as potent window shopping for women. "Romance has always been the literature that allows women to explore their sexuality and desires in a very unencumbered way," the Ripped Bodice's Bea Koch said. "Women's emotions and sexuality are centred. That's important when a lot of pornography centres on the male gaze."

The Ripped Bodice doesn't carry Harlequin, focusing instead on diverse titles from the indie romance genre. Big stars in this world include Kit Rocha and the sci-fi romance series Beyond Shame; historical romance writer Courtney Milan and her contemporary novel Trade Me and Rebekah Weatherspoon and her bondage fantasy Haven, which features a rugged mountain-man hero.

"Women read romance because it makes them happy," Leah Koch said.

The genre's appeal is escapist: It's inherently idealistic, a world of women writing for women about the men (and the lives) they want.

"It's a very powerful escape from their lives and so many women need that," said Angela Miles, a professor of global feminist movements at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education who has researched the romance genre.

"Women read them when they're under pressure. They read them when they've just had a baby, which is why they give them out free at hospitals," Miles said. "If you have no time to yourself, if you can't go out, if you're totally stuck, you can read them."

Staggering romance sales make clear that women need an escape hatch: 25 per cent of Canadian women age 18 to 64 are romance readers, according to Harlequin market research. Since launching in 1949, Harlequin has sold approximately 6.7 billion books.

Like many other romance fans, Sarah Phalen tears through three books a week. "They're my favourite thing to read," said the 38-year-old Toronto customer-service rep.

Phalen got into Harlequin one summer when she was 13. Her aunt worked for the Toronto Public Library and had romance novels lying around the cottage. "It was very scandalous," Phalen said.

She preordered the first Dare books ahead of the line's launch. Amid the deadening news cycle of #MeTooPhalen said she found solace in the heroines who get to own their sexuality. Her only complaint is that Harlequin's foray into raw female desire came so late.

"This is overdue," she said. "We can handle it."

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/in-harlequins-new-romance-novels-heroines-own-theirsexuality/article37889301/



Feb. 14, 2018 "A labour of love": Today I found this article by Jen Miller in the Edmonton Journal:

In college during summer and holiday breaks, I worked in a mall bookstore.


Our most popular promotion was a summer one: buy two books, get one free. Romance readers loved it.


One afternoon, an older woman filled up a milk crate with books and told me as she paid that it was her favourite day of the year.


Our stockroom guy muttered “loser” when she left.


I wasn’t surprised. I wouldn’t be surprised if someone said it to me today, nearly 20 years later. Romance novels have been labelled as bad, stupid, insipid and for “losers” since long before parachute pants existed.


Despite romance novels making up 23 per cent of the U.S. fiction market in 2016, according to NPD Books and Consumers, the genre is still pushed aside as either mommy porn or the default reading of lonely cat laden spinsters who can only find a man in the fantasyland these books provide.


Romance gets trashed because “it traffics in emotion and empathy and personal connection and values happiness,” says Sarah Wendell, co-founder of Smart Bitches, Trashy Books, and author of three books.


It’s also a business run by women, and selling to women.


The Nielsen Romance Buyer Survey has consistently tracked women as making up more than 80 per cent of romance novel buyers.


Wendell cites a quote from Nora Roberts, whose books have sold more than 500 million copies worldwide, and who has called romance the “hat trick of easy targets: emotions, relationships and sex.”


I started reading romance as a teenager.


One grandmother gave me her Nora Roberts books; the other gave me Maeve Binchy books.

Readers have options as wide as the internet, from pregnancy romances to Amish romances (which are very popular with Christians who aren’t Amish) to shape-shifter romances to male/male romances written for heterosexual women, to BSDM books that make Fifty Shades of Grey look tame.


Traditional romance publishing, like the rest of publishing, isn’t as diverse as the general population (only 7.8 per cent of books published by romance publishers in 2016 were written by people of colour, according to a study conducted by The Ripped Bodice, a California romance bookstore), but romance writers were also among the “earliest to figure out how to make self-publishing work, and form small-group publishing enterprises to publish their stories,” Wendell says. 


Popular coverage doesn’t often embrace that side of romance novels, though, and it still leans heavily into stereotypes of “bodice rippers,” which often included rape, even though that style of romance was thrown out in 1970s.


“You just come back to ‘it’s s--fiction because women read it,’ and the people who condemn it very seldom read it themselves,” says John Market, author of Publishing Romance: The History of an Industry, 1940s to the Present.


When The New York Times Book Review dedicated its cover to romance novels in September, for example, editors gave the assignment to Robert Gottlieb, an 86-year-old white man. The results are about what you’d expect.


As long as women are treated as though their greatest value is still determined as what our bodies can provide for men — as controlled by men — books written for and by us will be treated like dirt, too.


“If those attitudes are there about the woman’s place as a sexual object, then we’ve got a long way to go,” says Market.


“Since the books are about women’s sexuality and focuses on the sexual aspect and emotions revolving around love, it tends to be put down as fluff.”


PressReader.com - Digital Newspaper & Magazine Subscriptions


My opinion: I don't read romance novels.  As a kid and teen, I read young adult novels and mainly about teenage girls as the protagonists.  By my early 20s, I was still reading YA.  


I mainly stopped reading fictional books, and watched more TV because I wanted to be a TV writer and producer.


I was in in Professional Communication for 2 yrs at MacEwan so I read and wrote.


I wrote my TV scripts and read some screenwriting books.