Monday, June 5, 2017

"Mr. Right or Mr. Rich?"/ "For me, writing is really an agony"

Sept. 13, 2016 "Mr. Right or Mr. Rich?": I cut out this article by Joanna Goodman in the Globe and Mail on May. 30, 2012:

It’s always a delight to stumble upon a chick-lit novel that is smart, well-crafted and witty. Such is the case with Kim Izzo’s The Jane Austen Marriage Manual, a debut novel that brings class to the genre.
I’m not going to lie. At first I was skeptical of the premise: A single, 40-year-old woman goes on a mission to prove that she, and others like her, can “make a good marriage” in modern times. In other words, she throws her scruples out the window and sets off on a mercenary mission to marry for money. But in the spirit of the Jane Austen novels from which this story is inspired, I decided to keep an open mind and set my skepticism aside.
I’m glad I did. When we are first introduced to Kate Shaw, she is an acting beauty editor for a fashion magazine and living at home with her mother and grandmother. In rapid-fire succession, Kate loses her job, her beloved grandmother dies and her mother’s gambling debt forces them to sell their family home. In the bleak landscape of the recession, Kate finds herself jobless and homeless.

This is where the reader is asked to suspend belief: In the perfect storm of Kate’s grief, poverty and midlife crisis, she accepts a freelance assignment inspired by her heroine, Jane Austen, and sets out to answer the question of whether it is possible in this day and age to marry well.
But not only does Kate intend to write the article, she intends to live it as well. In her delusion, she hatches a plan to prove that a 40-year-old woman can find a husband for the sole purpose of financial security, and in so doing, solve her own family’s financial crisis.
It is at this point that Kate’s principles, independence and integrity are suddenly supplanted by those of an unrecognizable, calculating gold-digger.
To her credit, Izzo’s writing is so breezy and engaging, I was happy to buy in. Lady Kate (as she’s now known, thanks to the title her best friends bought her for her 40th birthday) travels from New York to St. Moritz and London, chasing and being chased by a cast of male characters ranging from the repugnant to the ravishing, seamlessly infiltrating the high society to which her future rich husband belongs.
Once Kate’s in Europe, the story really hits its stride. Izzo has either done her research or is well acquainted with the polo crowd. Her observations are wry and often hilarious, and the narrative flows briskly, as though Kate is an old friend confiding in us about her adventures traipsing across Switzerland.
She quickly hones in on Scott Madewell, a wealthy, attractive older man, but there’s a glitch in her plan in the form of sexy, antagonistic Griff Saunderson. (Didn’t see that one coming!) Kate is so focused on becoming Scott’s wife, she ignores the obvious mutual attraction with Griff, and the reader is left in suspense as to whether Kate will choose “Mr. Right or Mr. Rich.”

Kate is a mostly likeable character; she’s smart, self-deprecating and determined. In spite of her book’s few clichés and the inevitable neat and tidy “happily ever after,” Izzo has mastered structure and pace, and the result is an enjoyable, entertaining ode to Pride and Prejudice.
Love or money, that is the question. Original? Who cares? The point is, we do care about which man Kate is going to choose and whether, indeed, “happiness in marriage is entirely a matter of chance.”


"For me, writing is really an agony": I cut out this article by Alexandra Fuller in the Globe and Mail on Feb. 21, 2015:
Alexandra Fuller is the author of several acclaimed works of non-fiction, including the memoirs Don’t Let’s Go to the Dogs Tonight: An African Childhood and Cocktail Hour Under the Tree of Forgetfulness. Her latest book, Leaving Before the Rains Come, which was published last month, details the collapse of her marriage and her relationship with her father. Born in England and raised in southern Africa, Fuller studied at Acadia University in Nova Scotia and has lived in Wyoming since 1994.
Why did you write your new book?

I look around and pay attention to what around me is not being talked about, and then I talk about it with as much humour and honesty as I can. All my books have been that way. So this latest book is the story of arriving at my mid-40s with two children nearly grown, with another child under 10, and of my looking back to a childhood in Zambia and Zimbabwe for answers at how best to cope with the solitary confinement of a 20-year-long marriage in stalemate.
What’s the best advice you’ve ever received?

I am not sure this is advice, so much as a philosophy. My father once said to me, “The problem with most people is that they want to be alive for as long as possible without having an idea whatsoever how to live.” So I suppose it sent me on a mission to figure out how to live, which in turn took me to the philosophers and thinkers, and ultimately to those impulsive radical sages who move societies toward greater environmental and social justice.

Like Subcomandante Marcos of Mexico’s Zapatista movement who gave us this easy direction: “Abajo y a la izquierda está el corazón.” (“The heart lies below and to the left.”)
What question do you wish people would ask about your work (that they don’t ask)?

For me, writing is really an agony. I feel as if I have a huge, luminous idea that has the potential to be really profound, and then when I set it down on paper, I find the power of the idea has been hugely weakened in the process of transmission. So I might spend hours – sometimes days – crafting a single sentence, and yet very few people ever ask about that. Mostly I would like people to ask other writers about the craft of their writing, so we could learn from one another. We ask movie directors why they chose to use certain lights and angles and speeds of film, but most of the time we ignore the craft of a writer.
What scares you as a writer, and why?

I think I am like most writers – that one day I will wake up and find that the essentially mysterious inspiration will have left me, and I won’t know how to say what it is I want to say at all. And then once you have splattered the page with a few ideas, and sentences, and a story is starting to take shape, I am always terrified I won’t have the stamina to carry on.

The only process that comes close to the process of writing a whole book, in my experience, is childbirth. There is this moment when you think you can’t possibly labour for another moment and that, paradoxically is when you have to push hardest. I guess I am always a bit frightened that the day will come when I don’t have it in me to push all the way to the end.
Which book do you think is under-appreciated?

Artful by Ali Smith.


Sunday, May 28, 2017

TV and movie comparisons/ my old scripts

    

Feb. 14, 2016 Comparisons:

A character kidnaps the wrong person:

It was done on the TV show In Plain Sight.  The bad guys were to kidnap Brandy, but instead kidnapped Mary who is a FBI Witness protection agent.

It was kind of done in the movie Alpha Dog:

1999, Claremont, California. Middle-class kids, in their 20s, talk trash, wave guns, hang out in a pack. Johnny Truelove, drug dealer and son of a underworld figure, threatens Jake Mazursky, an explosive head case who owes Johnny money; Jake responds by breaking into Johnny's house. On impulse, Johnny and a couple pals kidnap Jake's 15-year-old brother, Zach. Zach's okay with it, figuring his brother will pay the debt soon. Johnny assigns his buddy Frankie to be Zach's minder, and they develop a brotherly friendship. Zach parties with his captors as things begin to spin out of control. Group think, amorality, and fear of prison assert a hold on the pack. Is Zach in danger? Written by


Also this movie:

A senator arranges for his son, a rich white kid who fancies himself black, to be kidnapped by a couple of black actors pretending to be murderers to try and shock him out of his plans to become a rapper.


Character A chases another Character B to get something that A wants:

Premium Rush:

In Manhattan, a bike messenger picks up an envelope that attracts the interest of a dirty cop, who pursues the cyclist throughout the city.



The TV show Dark Angel had an episode called "Art Attack" where 2 things were delivered to 2 different places.  Max then has to deliver to the right people.  The boss Normal was kidnapped by the mob so Max had to save his life by delivering the package.

Sept. 5, 2016 A character or characters running in the woods: The Blair Witch Project, The Hunger Games.

Mar. 5, 2017:
The line "I would rather be judged by 12, than carried by 6": It's mainly on cop shows.

I saw this on the TV show
Frequency:

"A police detective in 2016 discovers that she is able to communicate with her father via a ham radio, despite the fact that he died in 1996."
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5531470/?ref_=nv_sr_1

I watched the Training Day pilot and a character says the same thing too:

"TV follow-up to the 2001 film 'Training Day' about a rookie cop partnered with a corrupt officer."
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4946972/?ref_=nv_sr_1

Mar. 7, 2017 The lead character's close friend/ cop partner dies.  The lead character avenges his or her death:

Training Day pilot: Kyle's cop partner was killed on the job.  Kyle has to avenge her death in the pilot.

Arrow episode: In season 5, Dinah's cop partner was killed and she avenges his death.

APB: The pilot has the billionaire Gideon's friend killed as he was protecting him.

"After witnessing a violent crime, a tech billionaire purchases a troubled police precinct, rebooting it as a private police force."
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5542294/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

The pilot was average.  I never watched the show after that.

Writing tip: A character has to have a deep and meaningful reason to achieve a big goal.  It also has more drama, conflict, and tension and raises the emotional stakes.

Mar. 17, 2017
"2 worlds colliding."  A Bad Guy and a Good Guy are together.  A Bad Guy gets into the Good Guy's personal life and professional workplace:

It was done on
Mary Kills People episode "Wave the White Flag" where the drug dealer Grady goes to the hospital that Mary works at.

It was done before on
Rookie Blue episode "Going Under."  Chris arrests his personal drug dealer Jamie (played by Edmonton actor Kyle Mac) and Jamie is at the precinct.

Apr. 14, 2017
A character goes missing.  Years later, he or she reappears:

The TV show Thirteen:

"26-year-old Ivy Moxam steps out of an ordinary house, on an ordinary street, on an ordinary day. Ivy hasn't been seen for thirteen years, she was kidnapped in 2003 at the age of thirteen."
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5159916/

The Family: This show came out in 2016.  It was very good with the writing and acting.

"A community is rattled when a politician's son, who was presumed murdered years ago, returns home."
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4428038/?ref_=fn_al_tt_2

Apr. 17, 2017 A character force feeds kids and teens medication:

I was watching a
Blindspot season 2 episode called "Senile Lines."

"As the team tries to defend itself against an old rival, a tattoo leads them to a mysterious death at a foster home."

It turns out the foster mother was feeding the foster kids and teens she was taking care of, with this medication to help them.  It was really to test the medication on them so this doctor and drug company could get their drugs FDA approved faster.


My script: It reminded me of the second TV series I ever wrote when I was 15 yrs old and in gr. 10.  I wrote something like this before.  It was more about this school that was forcing teens/ students to take medication (like Ritalin) to improve their grades.

The script was called
Wired.  It wasn't really developed, because there was no deeper reason.

Why is the school force feeding medication to students to get good grades?  There is drama, conflict, and tension there.

So the school gets good grades and then get more money for the school? 

Or you can give the students really easy tests so they can get good grades.  A couple of months ago, I read in the
Edmonton Journal about teachers inflating grades.

A family adopts a kid/ teen:

Kyle XY:

"A family takes in a formerly institutionalized teen savant who is missing standard human behaviors such as anger, joy and love."
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0756509/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

This is Us:

"Follows a unique ensemble, as their paths cross and their life stories interwine, from sharing the same birthday, to so much more than anyone would expect."
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5555260/?ref_=nv_sr_1

A family adopts a baby here.

My script: It reminded me of the first TV series script I wrote called Outlier.  The family has 3 adopted kids and then a cousin moves in with them.  The cousin was eccentric with quirky habits.  I was 14 yrs old and in gr. 9.

Apr. 24, 2017: I was watching
Quantico and it reminded me of the show Alias.  When Quantico first came out, it was training people to be in the FBI.  In season 2, it was training people to be in the CIA.  On Alias, it was about a young woman was a CIA agent and became a double agent.

Teens and kids trained to be spies:

Wired: My TV script of teens being trained to be spies was inspired by me watching Alias.

Alex Rider: This was a book series that I read.  It turned into the movie Alex Rider: Operation Stormbreaker, but it didn't go well at the box office so there was no sequel.

"After the death of his uncle, the 14-year-old schoolboy Alex Rider is forced by the Special Operations Division of Britain's secret intelligence service, MI6, for a mission which will save millions of lives."


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0457495/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

Spy Kids: Kids as spies.

"The children of secret-agent parents must save them from danger."


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0227538/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

Kingsman: The Secret Service:

A spy organization recruits an unrefined, but promising street kid into the agency's ultra-competitive training program, just as a global threat emerges from a twisted tech genius.


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2802144/

This is my right brain/ writer making connections.

My left brain is saying: There is no way what the TV show Quantico teaches the recruits, they would ever teach teens these things.  The teens would not be able to get into these places and missions because they are teens.

I also thought no teen was really good or smart enough to be trained as spies because they are so young.  I know there are teens who have already decided what they want to be and careers they want to go into. 

When I was 14 yrs old, I wanted to be a TV writer and producer and I was going for that dream until after I graduated out of high school. 

However, I was deterred when I couldn't get into NAIT's TV program and went to their Graphic Communications program instead for a yr.  Then I went and started into the TV writer path again by getting into Professional Writing at MacEwan. 

I would not be good enough with the intelligence to get into FBI or CIA or be a cop.

Schools for specific talents: I was thinking about Victoria Performing Arts school and lots of performing art schools.

There is Wagner and they're a tech school.

However, there is no high school about law enforcement.

May 18, 2017
A flash forward to a few years into the future:

On Blindspot season 2 finale: There is 2 yrs into the future.

On Alias season 2 finale:  There is 2 yrs into the future.

On Desperate Housewives season 5 finale: There is 5 yrs into the future.

I had just finished watching the
Blindspot season 2 finale today.

May 25, 2017
A shoot out or action scene in a green house:

In
Smallville ep "Craving":

"Overweight Jodi submits to a diet of meteor-infested vegetables from her father's greenhouse. They magically make her thin, but she has an intense craving for body fat. Anyone in her vicinity is in danger, including her date, Pete."


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0702941/?ref_=ttep_ep8

There was one in the Flashpoint episode "Good Cop":

"When a cop mistakenly shoots and kills a teenage boy and is found innocent, Team One confronts a rioting crowd and a father whose dreams died the night he lost his son. "


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1946873/?ref_=ttep_ep2

There may have been a Criminal Minds episode. My week:


May 25, 2017 
Victoria Day long weekend: I worked all weekend.  However, I did have fun by sitting outside in my lawn chair and reading the newspaper.  The weather was warm.

Shades of Blue: I also watched the last 2 episodes of Shades of Blue season 2.  It was good because it was unpredictable with the characters getting killed.

Filmmakers Meetup: Yesterday I went to this, and I met 4 new people.

May 26, 2017
Things are getting cheaper:

Cellphone: Last month my cellphone of 3 yrs stopped working.  The microphone didn't work so people can't hear me.  I went to Dr. Mobile (in West Ed Mall) and they said they don't have the part or something.  I decided to buy a new cell phone.  The last one was $90.  This new one is $57.

I didn't want to buy one because I'm cheap.  But also I didn't want to adjust and adapt to a new cellphone.  I have to deal with change.


Recycle cellphone: I then mailed my cell phone to be recycled.  Place the cell phone (and battery) in the plastic bag/ envelope and mail it.

"Help the Phones- For Food program.  Proceeds from your recycled wireless phone will go to a local food bank.  You'll also be helping the environment."

www.phoneforfoods.com: This website (on the bag/ envelope) doesn't work, but the one below does:



http://www.recyclemycell.ca/participating-programs/

No- name chips at Shoppers Drug Mart: Each bag is 200 grams.  The deal is always buy 2 bags for $3.  I went there and it was 2 bags for $2 so that's good.  I bought it.

May 27, 2017 
Meeting: I had a meeting at work today.  It was alright.  I had pizza and got some leftovers too.

Tuesday, January 10, 2017

"Canadian' shakin'"

Sept. 13, 2016 "Canadian shakin'": I cut out this article by John Semley in the Globe and Mail on May. 30, 2015:

Recently, desirous of some Big Ideas, I began reading The Idea of Europe, George Steiner’s essay on, well, the idea of Europe. In it, Steiner – once called “the polymath’s polymath,” and what a distinction – takes a stab at establishing a cohesive, binding notion of Europe and Europeanism in the early 21st century, in the face of looming superpowers effectively laying waste to a millennia of European imperialism, hegemony and philosophical-intellectual roost-ruling.

“It is vital,” he writes, “that Europe reaffirm certain convictions and audacities of soul which the Americanization of the planet – with all its benefits and generosities – has obscured.”

Steiner locates all kinds of axioms of contemporary, and historical, Europeanism: the primacy of the coffee house intellectual life, a shared debt to the intellectual and cultural traditions of Ancient Greece and Judaism, the walkability of the cities, and so on. But in the passage quoted above, the whole holistic Idea of Europe is defined negatively, in antagonism to the “Americanization of the planet.” Whatever Europe is at the dawning of the new millennium, it’s for sure not American.

It’s a line we’ve grown accustomed to in Canada. Granted, we share something of Europe’s tension between economic and political unity and social particularity (the whole “cultural mosaic thing”). But, most of all, we share this anxiety re: Americanization. Maybe this is why Canadians are often told to wear those dumb maple leaf patches on their knapsacks when they travel abroad, in Europe and elsewhere. To be not-American is a show of solidarity, pretty much everywhere in the world except America.

But what if our anxiety about the sleeping giant to the south isn’t just a broad cultural neurosis? In War Plan Red, Kevin Lippert indexes the multiple instances in which Canada’s concern about American colonization was more acute, more literal. The book looks at multiple instances in which the United States has idly schemed, and actually endeavoured, to move its military north, right into our own personal home and native land. Lippert also looks at cases of Canadians eyeballing an invasion of America, as when Brigadier-General James (Buster) Brown surveyed a number of border states to see if they were ripe for annexation, hoping to push back against the United States’s “baleful influence on Canada.”

The threat of America invading Canada has served a number of flights of fictional fancy, be it in books (the North American super-union of David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest, which sees most of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico amalgamated into a European Union-style confederacy) or films (Michael Moore’s Canadian Bacon and the South Park movie come to mind). There’s a certain ludicrousness inherent in the idea – and not just because, strictly as a military scuffle, the whole thing would seemed wildly lopsided, like when Mussolini invaded Abyssinia. It just seems silly. Why invade poor ol’ Canada?

As War Plan Red points out, the more common question from America’s perspective has been, “Well, why not?” With a comically light touch (verging on flippancy), Lippert runs through plenty of examples of American-Canadian hostilities: notorious warmongering Kentucky politician Henry Clay calling for an invasion of British North America, the Pork and Beans War of 1838-39 (where militias were rallied to square off over the territorial borders of New Brunswick), and an 1859 incident where a skirmish almost erupted after an American shot a pig belonging to a Hudson’s Bay Company merchant (no shots were fired, save for the one that felled the swine).

About a third of the text is given over to a reproduction of the titular War Plan Red, a detailed plan for a full-scale U.S. invasion of Canada dating back to 1935, along with Defence Scheme No. 1, Lieutenant-Colonel Buster Brown’s crudely sketched blueprint for a counterattack against the U.S. With classic Canadian passive-aggressiveness, Defence Scheme No. 1 was actually an offensive plot, framed as a counteroffensive. (Hilariously, Brown assumed that Japan and Mexico would swiftly rush to aid a Canadian assault on the United States.)

Beyond being funny, if a little harrowing, in that stranger-than-fiction way, War Plan Red comes around to arguing that a merging of Canada and America (halfway-parasitic, halfway-symbiotic) has already occurred. As Lippert notes, the formation of the North American Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD) following the Second World War constituted a “de facto absorption of Canada into the American military-industrial complex.” The commingling of Canadian and American commerce and culture constituted other prongs in this silent invasion, yoking the two nations together even as they have “slipped quietly into peace.”

It’s the sort of thing that may kick-start another Canadian identity crisis. But then again, the Idea of Canada has rarely been resolved, with the question of what, exactly, it means to be Canadian seeming tantalizingly, frustratingly, unresolved. War Plan Red significantly undermines that common, anxious notion that to be Canadian is simply to be not-American. When WikiLeaks revealed a 2005 document detailing a “North American Initiative” to further entwine the Canadian and American economies (warning of restrictive Canadian regulatory measures), it seemed as if a different kind of War Plan Red was still on the table.

Why, after all, should that “Americanization of the planet” George Steiner warns about not extend to its neighbour to the north? Why is it so ludicrous to assume that some day, whether by full-scale military invasion or economic/culture commingling, we Canadians find ourselves paved into that great, sprawling Denny’s parking lot known as the United States of America?


 "I'm not a fan of grownups telling youngsters that they 'should' read this or that Great book": I cut out this article by Neal Stephenson in the Globe and Mail on May. 30, 2015:

An award-winning writer best known for his works of speculative fiction, Neal Stephenson’s most recent books are Reamde, Anathem and the Baroque Cycle – Quicksilver, The Confusion and The System of the World. Stephenson, who lives in Seattle, just published Seveneves, which follows the descendants of the survivors of an apocalyptic event on Earth as they return to their ancestral home 5,000 years later.

Why did you write your new book?

My new book is an idea that was banging around inside of my head for seven or eight years. Every so often I would feed it a little love. Finally it grew big and strong enough to kick its way out.

What question do you wish people would ask about your work (that they don’t ask)?

My favourite questions are the ones where the questioner has become so involved in the fictional world of the book that they have actually joined in on the creative process. They usually start with words like “Did it occur to you that…” or “Wouldn’t it be interesting if …” Frequently, I don’t know the answers to such questions, which is part of what makes them interesting.

Which historical period do you wish you’d lived through, and why?

“Lived through” is a pretty important part of that question, since it implies I would survive the dangers of tetanus, plague, fire, predatory beasts and random violence that would be part and parcel of any journey into the past. My answer may not strike you as terribly original, but I would like to have seen Rome at its peak. Not necessarily Rome itself. I’d settle for an outlying city that was part of the empire. It was, in many ways, an odious culture, but extremely good at getting things done and I’d like to have a better understanding of how that worked.

What scares you as a writer, and why?

I am worried that trends in the publishing industry may lead to a situation in which writing is no longer even remotely viable as a livelihood, except for a few lucky people. You could say that this has already been true for a while, but it seems to be getting more so.

What’s a book every 10-year-old should read, and why?

Whatever’s near to hand, fun to read, and as much of a guilty pleasure as possible. I’m not a fan of grownups telling youngsters that they “should” read this or that Great Book. Better to get in the habit of reading – you can find great books later just by following your nose.



Small Press Books: Here's a couple of reviews by Jade Colbert in the Globe and Mail on May. 30, 2015:

A Free Man
By Michel Basilières, ECW, 216 pages, $18.95

Michel Basilières’s long-awaited sophomore novel – 12 years after Black Bird was published to wide acclaim – sadly does not live up to expectations. It combines two of the author’s literary interests, sci-fi and Beat writing, which sounds fun. Here’s the problem: Stories of drug-fuelled spiritual awakening and robot-propelled time travel can both be exhilarating, but they can also be boring, each in their own way. A Free Man opens with Basilières finding at his door Skid Roe, an old friend with a crazy story about chasing a girl way out of his league and then meeting a robot from the future. Basilières is chewing an interesting problem: Skid faces constraints at every turn, so does he really have free will? The novel unfortunately gets mired in tedium: an uncompelling story of unrequited horniness with tacked-on futurism bogged down by the physics of time travel. Great premise, flawed execution.

The Bastard of Fort Stikine: The Hudson’s Bay Company and the Murder of John McLoughlin Jr.
By Debra Komar, Goose Lane, 288 pages, $19.95

This is a book about a murder, but more importantly it’s an indictment of corporate misrule and a history of the fur trade (and therefore this country) like you probably haven’t read. Forensic anthropologist Debra Komar’s third book in a series on historic crimes in Canada opens the file on the murder of John McLoughlin Jr, who was shot dead by one of his own men one night in April, 1842. McLoughlin was the chief trader at Fort Stikine, a remote outpost of the Hudson’s Bay Company, where the “honourable company” sent the known criminals in its employ. By the evening of McLoughlin’s murder, it had devolved into a cesspool of paranoia, violence and conspiracy. HBC, fearful of public opinion, held a private investigation to cover up any scandal – the murderer was never tried. Thoroughly researched and in dramatic, evocative prose, Komar gives McLoughlin and HBC the trial they so justly deserved.